SRFP088: Relationship between maternal BMI and cesarean section procedure length in both family medicine and OB patients (Pearls)

Chanont Sricharoen, BS; Jeremy King, DO; Jenenne Geske, PhD; Birgit Khandalavala, MBBS

Abstract

Context – Maternal obesity in pregnant females is a health issue that can lead to increased risks and complications following a cesarean section (c-section) procedure. There are few studies that have examined the relationship between maternal body mass index (BMI) and procedure length, and it was unclear if family medicine physicians were included in any of them. This study is relevant to family medicine in that it can confirm that BMI is related to procedure length. As more patients with higher BMIs are undergoing c-sections, there is a growing need to anticipate maternal and neonatal morbidity outcomes along with associated risks and complications.

Objective – To assess the relationship between maternal BMI and procedure length in c-sections performed by family medicine and OB/GYN physicians.

Study Design – Retrospective medical records review

Setting – A midwestern regional health network

Database – Electronic Medical Records

Population Studied – 2343 patients who have undergone a c-section. Inclusion criteria include singleton deliveries by c-section in the Department of Family Medicine or the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology who have a minimum gestational age of 34 weeks and 0 days, and maternal age of 16-45. Data include height, weight, BMI, and surgical operative time. Demographics data were also collected.

Intervention – N/A

Main Outcome Measure – length of surgical time

Results – The average BMI of patients undergoing a cesarean section was 35.2 (SD=8.3). BMI was shown to be statistically significantly correlated with procedure length (start to delivery: r=.147, p<0.001).

Conclusions – BMI is statistically significantly positively correlated with procedure length. This relationship can be useful in estimating c-section procedure length with a given BMI. With the ever-increasing number of high BMI patients seen in both Family Medicine and OB/GYN departments, more c-sections will be favored for this patient population, leading to longer procedures with increased risks and complications such as increased risk of post-operative blood transfusions, longer hospitalizations, and increased neonatal morbidity.
Leave a Comment
Jack Westfall
jwestfall@aafp.org 11/21/2021

Great poster and abstract. Thanks for sharing at NAPCRG

Gillian Bartlett
gillian.bartlett@health.missouri.edu 11/21/2021

I was curious as to whether you are able to determine the medical necessity of the c-sections? Is there any possibility of obesity bias coming into play here? Regardless, this is an important topic to address for our population to mitigate risk for women with obesity.

William R. Phillips
wphllps@uw.edu 11/22/2021

Very interesting study using available data. Please clarify - were the "family medicine department patients" operated on by family physicians? If so, how did specialty of operating physician factor into procedure duration? There's a long history of maternity care research here at NAPCRG. I  presented my first study as a trainee back in 1978 at a meeting in Toronto comparing outcomes of vaginal deliveries by OB/GYN vs. FPs. Thanks for sharing your work here at NAPCRG.

Diane Harper
harperdi@med.umich.edu 11/22/2021

This continues to speak to the need for more fam med trained c section operators! Thank you for sharing your work with NAPCRG!

Andy Pasternak
avpiv711@sbcglobal.net 11/27/2021

Interesting study to look at procedure length. My wife (anesthesia) understands the importance of that !

Louise Acheson
11/30/2021

Interesting study. I am curious whether you were able to compare subgroups of CS by FP and OB physicians. Also, operative duration is dependent on primary vs. repeat CS. I would like to see your data, separating repeat CS from primary CS.

Social Media

Address

NAPCRG
11400 Tomahawk Creek Parkway
Leawood, KS 66211
800.274.7928
Email: napcrgoffice@napcrg.org