SRFP073: Outpatient COVID19 diagnosis and subsequent thromboembolic events

Kate Schreck, MD, BA; Jason Ricco, MD, MPH

Abstract

Context: Current research suggests that thromboembolic events may be one of several dangerous sequelae of COVID. Though the mechanism for these events is still debated, the data show an increased prevalence of thromboembolic disease in patients with severe COVID. Data does not yet exist for the outpatient setting, where the vast majority of positive SARS-CoV-2 results are found. The aim of this study is to examine the incidence proportion of thromboembolic events in this population, so as to ultimately make informed decisions about the appropriateness of prophylactic anticoagulation in the outpatient population.
Objective: What is the incidence proportion of thromboembolic events, including DVT, PE, CVA, among non-hospitalized patients diagnosed with COVID?
Study Design: Retrospective matched analysis
Population Studied: All adult patients seen in 2020 at any sites within a large urban health system who were not hospitalized in the time period with a primary diagnosis of COVID or unidentified respiratory illness. This included 168,089 patients. Average age was 50 years old and 62.2% were female. 87% White, 7% Black, 4% Asian, 1% Hispanic.
Main Outcome Measure: Diagnosis of thromboembolic event in 2020, including pulmonary embolism, cerebral infarction, deep vein thrombosis
Results: Preliminary results suggest there is no increased risk of thromboembolic events among patients positive for SARS-CoV-2 who did not require hospitalization for COVID.
Conclusions: Preliminary results suggest there is no increased risk of thromboembolic events for outpatient COVID19 diagnosis and therefore prophylactic anticoagulation is likely not warranted in the outpatient setting.
Learning Objective: On completion of this session, participants should be able to (1) describe the risk of thromboembolic events after COVID19 diagnosis and (2) explain the appropriate use of prophylactic anticoagulation therapy in the setting of COVID19 diagnosis.
Leave a Comment
Jack Westfall
jwestfall@aafp.org 11/21/2021

Every year at NAPCRG i learn something new. thanks for your work, research, poster, and for sharing at NAPCRG.

Diane Harper
harperdi@med.umich.edu 11/22/2021

Present your results in Phoenix next year! Thank you for sharing your work with NAPCRG!

William R. Phillips
wphllps@uw.edu 11/23/2021

Application of a great data set to answer an important clinical problem in our current Covid crisis. Your study design faces several methodologic challenges that need more explication than is available in a poster. I want to know more about how are you identified the time course of illness events, admission, testing and diagnosis for thromboembolic events. Does anybody get diagnosed - not suspected but dxd - with these thromboembolic events without being in the hospital? Just because the thromboembolic events do not get diagnosed before hospital admission does not mean that a program of anticoagulation would not improve health outcomes. That would require a RCT of that intervention program. Your data could help identify if there is a patient sub group at sufficiently higher risk to enroll in such an RCT. Perhaps the answer is no, but that's a bit of a different question than you have addressed here. Very interesting work. Thanks for sharing your work here at NAPCRG . - Bill Phillips

Alison Huffstetler
alison.huffstetler@vcuhealth.org 11/23/2021

I agree with several of Bills questions, clarifying the methods. But the results do seem consistent with other studies on the same topic. I also wonder if the population that was studied is representative of your community? Seems largely white, however, that may be geographically consistent. Nice work and thanks for sharing!

Andy Pasternak
avpiv711@sbcglobal.net 11/28/2021

Great work on this! Very important topic

Social Media

Address

NAPCRG
11400 Tomahawk Creek Parkway
Leawood, KS 66211
800.274.7928
Email: napcrgoffice@napcrg.org