PRP094: Tribally Engaged Approaches to Lung Screening (TEALS) Study – Year 2 Pilot

Zsolt Nagykaldi, PhD; Kathleen Dwyer, PhD, RN; Mark Doescher, MD, MSPH; Dorothy Rhoades, MD, MPH; Brook McCann, RN; Cara Vaught, MPH

Abstract

Context: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality among American Indians and Alaska Natives (AI/AN), and AI/AN have worse lung cancer incidence rates, survival, and death compared to the general population. Although lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose computed tomography is a grade-B USPSTF recommendation, uptake of LCS has been slow in most healthcare systems. LCS implementation among AI/AN has not been studied before in detail.

Objective: To address this knowledge and implementation gap, we initiated a multi-phase, 5-year “Tribally Engaged Approaches to Lung Screening" (TEALS) study in 2019 to co-design and test a tribal community-engaged LCS implementation program.

Setting: TEALS will be conducted in 8 primary care centers of the Choctaw Nation Health Services Authority (CNHSA) in Southeast Oklahoma using a Community-Engaged Research (CEnR) approach.

Study Design: In Year 2 of TEALS, we initiated a pre-post pilot implementation study in 2 CNHSA health centers to prepare for a subsequent RCT.

Population Studied: AI patients (N=100), who meet LCS criteria and clinicians/staff/leadership (N~20) from all CNHSA primary care centers.

Intervention: Two CNHSA practices received EHR reminders for LCS and access to smoking cessation services, in addition to care system improvements, including an LCS Care Coordinator, quality benchmarking and feedback, academic detailing, practice facilitation, and technical support.

Outcomes: Changes in LCS care pathways and care delivery (primary), patient morbidity profile and care experiences (secondary/patient-level), and practice LCS care system improvements (secondary/practice-level).

Results: By the end of Year 2, our team will have implemented and evaluated a pilot LCS program in 2 CNHSA health centers. Many lessons will have been learned regarding major barriers and some solutions arising from the implementation and from the COVID-19 pandemic.

Future Steps: Initiation of a CHNSA-wide RCT in Years 3 & 4.
Leave a Comment
Diane Harper
harperdi@med.umich.edu 11/21/2021

This is wonderful research! You state that it is community engaged research project. Were you funded by NCI before you engaged with the community? How did the community define your grant submission? I would like to connect about future opportunities. Thank you for sharing your work with NAPCRG.

Zsolt Nagykaldi
znagykal@ouhsc.edu 11/22/2021

Diane, I am very happy to tell you more about the wider context of our engagement with the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma (as well as many other community partners on other projects). No, NCI did not pay for establishing this relationship. It has been in place for many years based on other projects we have done with this community partner. The initial engagement is hard to get funding for. Sometimes you can use local foundations or perhaps your academic CTS funds (we have one for partnership building) to build relationships, other times it is unsupported work. Either way, once there relationship is established and if it grows strong, you can continue working on subsequent projects and maintain these collaborations.

Jack Westfall
jwestfall@aafp.org 11/22/2021

This is a very important topic and research study. Nice work. Thanks

Zsolt Nagykaldi
znagykal@ouhsc.edu 11/22/2021

Thanks Jack! We are trying to initiate a system-wide RCT right now (with a delayed intervention group), but COVID makes everything very hard. We are quite delayed and still have no good access to the community sites, but we are doing our best. Our pilot already provided some useful insights.

William Hogg
whogg@uottawa.ca 12/31/2021

Hi Zsolt. Good to see you doing this important work.

Social Media

Address

NAPCRG
11400 Tomahawk Creek Parkway
Leawood, KS 66211
800.274.7928
Email: napcrgoffice@napcrg.org