SRFP008: An overview of the effectiveness of nursing practices for chronic disease management in primary care

Emilie Dufour; Arnaud Duhoux, PhD; Jolianne Bolduc; Martin Charette, PhD; Isabelle Dufour, PhD, RN; Jérôme Leclerc-Loiselle

Abstract

Context: Primary care teams have a central role in the management of chronic diseases. Within these teams, nurses are key players, involved in several dimensions of the quality of care provided to these populations. Improving nurses' practices is a central component of performance in the management of chronic diseases and complex primary care needs, particularly in coordination, continuity of care and self-care activities.
Objectives: To identify nursing practices that contribute to optimal chronic disease management in primary care settings.
Study design : Systematic overview of systematic reviews. Quantitative systematic reviews were included and mixed-method systematic reviews were considered if quantitative data were separated. The methodological quality was assessed independently by two reviewers using the AMSTAR 2 tool. The design of this review is based on the recommendations of The Joanna Briggs Institute.
Setting or Dataset : A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews as well as grey literature. Publications in English and French were considered (2005-2020).
Population Studied : Adults receiving care for one or more chronic condition(s).
Intervention/ Instrument : Any intervention, care, procedure, practice or service provided by a nurse in primary care.
Main and Secondary Outcome Measures: Outcomes include any measure that reflects an improvement in service delivery or health outcomes for patients with chronic condition(s).
Results or Anticipated Results: Thirty-four systematic reviews were included in the overview. Nursing practices associated with positive outcomes will be categorized according to four components of the Chronic Care Model. For each intervention, a synthesis of its main characteristics (mode, intensity, frequency, duration, care structure, provider qualifications), target populations (age, number of chronic diseases, recent hospitalization history and physician affiliation) will be presented.
Conclusions: This review provides a portrait of nursing practices that have demonstrated improved patient outcomes. Therefore, this synthesis could be used as a basis for identifying gaps between best practices and current practices in order to foster the conditions necessary for their deployment in primary care.
Leave a Comment
Jack Westfall
jwestfall@aafp.org 11/21/2021

Terrific poster and presentation. Thanks for your work.

William R. Phillips
wphllps@uw.edu 11/22/2021

Great. For translation to the US and other healthcare systems, it would be very helpful to know the training and professional role of these primary care nurses. How are nurse practitioners handled in the original systematic reviews and in your synthesis? Atthis sophisticated level of review of reviews, what is the place of the voice of the nurse, the physician or other PC team members, and the patient? Hope you continue on this important line of inquiry. Thanks for sharing your work here at NAPCRG. - Bill Phillips

Diane Harper
harperdi@med.umich.edu 11/22/2021

always! Present your results in Phoenix next year! Thank you for sharing your work with NAPCRG!

Andy Pasternak
avpiv711@sbcglobal.net 11/28/2021

Really nice poster! Eager to see the results...

Social Media

Address

NAPCRG
11400 Tomahawk Creek Parkway
Leawood, KS 66211
800.274.7928
Email: napcrgoffice@napcrg.org