PCR065: Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Registered Nurses in Primary Care

Julia Lukewich, PhD, RN; Shabnam Asghari, MD, PhD, MPH; Allison Norful; Denise Bryant-Lukosius, PhD, RN, CON ( C ); Emily Marshall, PhD, MSc; Joan Tranmer, PhD, RN; Maria Mathews, PhD; Marie-Eve Poitras, PhD, MSc, RN; Michelle Swab, MA, MLIS; Dana Ryan, BA, MA; Ruth Martin-Misener, PhD

Abstract

Context: Internationally, registered nurses (RNs) are increasingly working in team-based primary care settings. Despite this, there remains a lack of evidence about the effectiveness of their contributions to outcomes. A systematic review of the literature is essential to inform further integration and optimal utilization of RNs within primary care teams. Objective: The purpose of this systematic review was to synthesize the evidence regarding the effectiveness of RNs in primary care on processes of care and outcomes. Study Design: Systematic review in accordance with Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. Dataset: A comprehensive search of relevant databases (e.g. CINAHL, Medline Complete) was conducted using relevant subject headings and keywords. Additional grey literature was identified through Google Scholar, nursing organization websites, and searches of key journals/authors. Population studied: An initial 6408 titles/abstracts were screened for relevancy, resulting in 268 full-text articles to be assessed. Eligible studies reported on any quantitative outcome of an intervention/process delivered by RNs in primary care. All studies were published in English. No date or location restrictions were applied. Risk of bias was assessed using the Integrated Quality Criteria for Review of Multiple Study Designs tool. Outcome Measures: The final review consisted of 26 studies. Extracted data included information on study design, data collection methods, primary care settings, RN interventions, and outcomes. Results: The results yielded 20 distinct outcomes, identified at either the patient-level (n=9) or care delivery/system-level (n=11). Patient outcomes consisted of self-report measures (e.g. satisfaction, quality of life) and clinically-assessed health indicators (e.g. HbA1C, blood pressure). Care delivery/system outcomes examined the quality of RN care provision and broader health system measures (e.g. service utilization, cost). RN-delivered care was equivalent to or better than care delivered by other providers, specifically with respect to chronic disease management, smoking cessation, and wellness counselling. There was a high level of reported patient satisfaction regarding RN-led care. Conclusions: This review provides important evidence on the effectiveness of RNs on primary care outcomes. Strengthened assessment approaches and consensus on outcome measures are needed to address healthcare challenges and support further evaluation.
Leave a Comment
Jack Westfall
jwestfall@aafp.org 11/20/2021

terrific work. primary care as team care is so important. thanks for the research and presentation.

Henry Olaisen
holaisen@aafp.org 11/21/2021

Well done! Appreciate that you organized the articles according to established frameworks. Strength-based reporting is so refreshing. Thank you.

Diane Harper
harperdi@med.umich.edu 11/21/2021

is this top of license practice by RN's? how does this intersect with what advanced practitioners can do? great work!

Shabnam Asghari
11/22/2021

The role of RNs varied across studies but all roles were within their scope of practice. We only focused on RNs, did not evaluate roles of other nurse providers. There is considerably more research looking at advanced practice nursing though.

Gillian Bartlett
gillian.bartlett@health.missouri.edu 11/23/2021

Excellent work! RN are important providers in the primary care world so great to see a formal evaluation of this. keep up the excellent work.

Andy Pasternak
avpiv711@sbcglobal.net 11/28/2021

Love your poster layout. Very well done

William Hogg
whogg@uottawa.ca 12/31/2021

Love it.

Social Media

Address

NAPCRG
11400 Tomahawk Creek Parkway
Leawood, KS 66211
800.274.7928
Email: napcrgoffice@napcrg.org